European Implementation Network
  • Home
  • Overview of the Network Vision, Mission & Goals Structure & Governance EIN Board EIN Members & Partners Secretariat Staff Our Funders
  • Overview Support us NGO Briefings Advocacy Training Previous training
  • Faces of Implementation Why Implementation Matters The Implementation Process Why You Should Get Involved Early case closure
  • Country Map
  • Overview Human Rights Defenders Journalists and the Media Freedom of Assembly Politicians Other Civic Space Rights
  • Freedom of Expression Independence of the Judiciary Justice Delayed, Justice Denied
  • EIN Publications EIN Handbook Advocacy Guide Country Reports Rule 9 Submission Guide NGO Publications Documents from the Council of Europe
  • News EIN Calendar EIN Voices EIN June Conference 2022 Newsletters News Archive
  • Join EIN
  • Work with us
  • Contact Us
European Implementation Network
  • Home/
  • Who We Are/
    • Overview of the Network
    • Vision, Mission & Goals
    • Structure & Governance
    • EIN Board
    • EIN Members & Partners
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Our Funders
  • What We Do/
    • Overview
    • Support us
    • NGO Briefings
    • Advocacy
    • Training
    • Previous training
  • Why Implementation Matters/
    • Faces of Implementation
    • Why Implementation Matters
    • The Implementation Process
    • Why You Should Get Involved
    • Early case closure
  • Country Map/
  • Cases/
    • Overview
    • Human Rights Defenders
    • Journalists and the Media
    • Freedom of Assembly
    • Politicians
    • Other Civic Space Rights
  • Projects/
    • Freedom of Expression
    • Independence of the Judiciary
    • Justice Delayed, Justice Denied
  • Resources/
    • EIN Publications
    • EIN Handbook
    • Advocacy Guide
    • Country Reports
    • Rule 9 Submission Guide
    • NGO Publications
    • Documents from the Council of Europe
  • News/
    • News
    • EIN Calendar
    • EIN Voices
    • EIN June Conference 2022
    • Newsletters
    • News Archive
  • Join EIN/
  • Work with us/
  • Contact Us /
European Implementation Network

Making human rights a reality

FoE Rule 9 submissions

European Implementation Network
  • Home/
  • Who We Are/
    • Overview of the Network
    • Vision, Mission & Goals
    • Structure & Governance
    • EIN Board
    • EIN Members & Partners
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Our Funders
  • What We Do/
    • Overview
    • Support us
    • NGO Briefings
    • Advocacy
    • Training
    • Previous training
  • Why Implementation Matters/
    • Faces of Implementation
    • Why Implementation Matters
    • The Implementation Process
    • Why You Should Get Involved
    • Early case closure
  • Country Map/
  • Cases/
    • Overview
    • Human Rights Defenders
    • Journalists and the Media
    • Freedom of Assembly
    • Politicians
    • Other Civic Space Rights
  • Projects/
    • Freedom of Expression
    • Independence of the Judiciary
    • Justice Delayed, Justice Denied
  • Resources/
    • EIN Publications
    • EIN Handbook
    • Advocacy Guide
    • Country Reports
    • Rule 9 Submission Guide
    • NGO Publications
    • Documents from the Council of Europe
  • News/
    • News
    • EIN Calendar
    • EIN Voices
    • EIN June Conference 2022
    • Newsletters
    • News Archive
  • Join EIN/
  • Work with us/
  • Contact Us /

Rule 9.2 communications

As part of EIN’s project on freedom of expression, our partners and beneficiaries are engaging with the CM judgment execution process and contribute to enhancing full, timely and effective implementation of ECtHR free speech related judgments. To do so, they are submitting communications - as per Rule 9.2 of the CM Rules - which may cover both individual and general measures, and can be submitted at any point of time in respect of any case pending before the CM. Such engagement can make a vital contribution to the effectiveness of the process. Indeed, without stakeholder involvement the CM faces the risk of hearing only the state’s account concerning the implementation of judgments.

To date, our partners and beneficiaries have already submitted 39 rule 9.2 communications within the framework of our ongoing project on freedom of expression:

Azerbaijan

Rule 9.2 Communication from an Media Rights Group in the group of cases MAHMUDOV AND AGAZADE v. Azerbaijan (02/08/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Media Rights Group in the case of Rovshan Hajiyev v. Azerbaijan (20/11/2023)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Media Defence in the group of cases Khadija Ismayilova v. Azerbaijan (02/05/2024)

Bulgaria

Rule 9.2 Communication from the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee (BHC) in the case of Mestan v. Bulgaria (29/11/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Bulgarian Helsinki Committee (BHC) in the case of Miroslava Todorova v. Bulgaria (05/06/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Bulgarian Helsinki Committee (BHC) in the case of Miroslava Todorova v. Bulgaria (19/04/2024)

 

Croatia

Joint Rule 9.2 Communication from Human Rights House Zagreb (HRHZ) and Croatian Journalists Association (HND) in the case of Stojanovic v. Croatia (23/01/2024)

Joint Rule 9.2 Communication from Human Rights House Zagreb (HRHZ) and Croatian Journalists Association (HND) in the case of Stojanovic v. Croatia (01/12/2023)

France

Rule 9.2 Communication from Generation for Rights Over the World (GROW) in the group of cases Rouillan v. France (30/08/2024)

 

Hungary

Rule 9.2 Communication from Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU), Hungarian Helsinki Committee (HHC) and others in the case of Kenedi v. Hungary (24/05/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Hungarian Helsinki Committee (HHC) in the group of cases Baka v. Hungary (22/04/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from the Hungarian Helsinki Committee (HHC) and Amnesty International Hungary in the case of Baka v. Hungary (05/10/2023)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) in the case of ATV Zrt v. Hungary (03/05/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) in the case of Szurovecz v. Hungary (13/11/2023)

Italy

Rule 9.2 Communication from Strategic Litigation (StraLi) and Coalizione Italiana Liberta e Diritti Civili (CILD) in the case of Ricci v. Italy (29/10/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Article 19 in the case of Belpietro v. Italy (09/09/2024)

Lithuania

Rule 9.2 Communication from Human Rights Monitoring Institute in the case of Eigirdas and VI Demokratijos pletros fondas v. Lithuania (13/12/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Human Rights Monitoring Institute (HRMI), National LGBTI rights organisation LGL, Lithuanian Centre for Human Rights and ILGA in the case of Macate v. Lithuania (30/07/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Human Rights Monitoring Institute (HRMI) in the case of Marcinkevicius v. Lithuania (24/01/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Human Rights Monitoring Institute (HRMI) in the case of Macate v. Lithuania (08/01/2024)

Luxembourg

Rule 9.2 Communication from the Human Rights Center at Ghent University in the case of Halet v. Luxembourg (29/11/2024)

 

Moldova

Rule 9.2 Communication from Independent Journalism Center (IJC) in the case of Manole and others v. the Republic of Moldova (25/01/2024)

 

Poland

Rule 9.2 Communication from Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (HFHR) in the case of Rabczewska v. Poland (21/11/2023)

 

Romania

Rule 9.2 Communication from an Association for the Defence of Human Rights in Romania (APADOR-CH) in the group of cases Ghiulfer Predescu v. Romania (03/06/2024)

 

Slovakia

Rule 9.2 Communication from Forum for Human Rights (FORUM) in the case of Ringier Axel Springer Slovakia, a.s. v. Slovakia (no. 4) (02/12/2024)

 

Türkiye

Rule 9.2 Communication from Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA) in the case of OZGUR RADYO-SES RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYIN YAPIM VE TANITIM AS. v. Türkiye (28/03/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA) in the case of Oya Ataman v. Türkiye (25/03/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Ifade Özgürlüğü Derneği (IFOD - Freedom of Expression Association) in the groups of cases of Altug Taner Akcam, Nedim Sener, Isikirik, Oner and Turk and Artun and Guvener groups v. Türkiye (06/03/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Media and Law Studies Association (MSLA) in the case of Isikirik v. Türkiye (23/02/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Truth Justice Memory Center (Hakikat Adalet Hafıza Merkezi), Media and Law Studies Association (MSLA), Turkish Human Rights Association (İnsan Hakları Derneği) and others in the cases of Altug Taner Akcam, Artun and Guvener, Isikirik, Nedim Sener, Oner and Turk groups of cases v. Türkiye (30/01/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA) in the cases of Altug Taner Akcam, Artun and Guvener, Nedim Sener and Oner and Turk groups v. Türkiye (25/01/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Turkish Human Rights Association (İnsan Hakları Derneği) in the cases of Altug Taner Akcam, Artun and Guvener, Isikirik, Nedim Sener and Oner and Turk groups v. Türkiye (24/01/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Ifade Özgürlüğü Derneği (IFOD – Freedom of Expression Association) in the case of Cox v. Türkiye (05/01/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Hafiza Merkezi, MLSA and other NGOs in the case of Oya Ataman v. Turkey (24/11/2023)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Media and Law Studies Association (MSLA) in the case of Ulusoy and others v. Türkiye (06/11/2023)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Ifade Ozgurlugu Dernegi (IFOD – Freedom of Expression Association) in the case of Ahmet Yildirim v. Türkiye (03/11/2023)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Media and Law Studies Association (MSLA) in the case of Ahmet Yildirim and Cengiz and Others v. Türkiye (18/10/2023)

Ukraine

Rule 9.2 Communication from an Human Rights Platform in the group of cases Centre for Democracy and the Rule of Law v. Ukraine (29/07/2024)

Rule 9.2 Communication from Human Rights Platform in the case of Sedletska v. Ukraine (23/05/2024)

 

  • Home/
  • Who We Are/
    • Overview of the Network
    • Vision, Mission & Goals
    • Structure & Governance
    • EIN Board
    • EIN Members & Partners
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Our Funders
  • What We Do/
    • Overview
    • Support us
    • NGO Briefings
    • Advocacy
    • Training
    • Previous training
  • Why Implementation Matters/
    • Faces of Implementation
    • Why Implementation Matters
    • The Implementation Process
    • Why You Should Get Involved
    • Early case closure
  • Country Map/
  • Cases/
    • Overview
    • Human Rights Defenders
    • Journalists and the Media
    • Freedom of Assembly
    • Politicians
    • Other Civic Space Rights
  • Projects/
    • Freedom of Expression
    • Independence of the Judiciary
    • Justice Delayed, Justice Denied
  • Resources/
    • EIN Publications
    • EIN Handbook
    • Advocacy Guide
    • Country Reports
    • Rule 9 Submission Guide
    • NGO Publications
    • Documents from the Council of Europe
  • News/
    • News
    • EIN Calendar
    • EIN Voices
    • EIN June Conference 2022
    • Newsletters
    • News Archive
  • Join EIN/
  • Work with us/
  • Contact Us /

European Implementation Network

EINNETWORK

einnetwork.org

 

EIN Calendar

Subscribe

Sign up with your email address to receive news and updates.

We respect your privacy.

Thank you!

European Implementation Network

EIN works with NGOs and others across Europe, to make judgments of the European Court of Human Rights provide real protections of fundamental rights.

Making human rights a reality

Contact Us
Support Us

Join Us Online

LinkedIn / Instagram / Facebook

Subscribe to our newsletter